Ground Truth
From the Ground Up
Grassroots issues, traced to the record. What's being debated right now and who's driving it, the home-turf Colorado ballot fights, the voices worth following left to right, and the founding question underneath it all: what rights should the internet guarantee? Weighed on the merits, both sides on the table.
The Issues
What's being debated right now, what has grassroots energy behind it, who's driving it — and whether it's actually reaching the politicians.
Election Integrity
How elections are run — chain of custody, voter-roll maintenance, drop boxes, machine audits, and who is allowed to examine the results. One side sees necessary safeguards and transparency; the other sees suppression and unfounded doubt.
Grassroots energy: Volunteer canvassers, county-clerk watchdogs, and open-records groups pushing for hand-count audits and access to the machines.
Who's driving it
Free Speech & Censorship
Where moderation ends and censorship begins — deplatforming, shadow-bans, "misinformation" labels, and government pressure on platforms. One side calls it trust-and-safety; the other calls it a censorship-industrial complex.
Grassroots energy: Independent journalists and free-speech nonprofits, energized by the Twitter Files disclosures and the ongoing platform-moderation fights.
Who's driving it
Surveillance & Digital Rights
Warrantless surveillance, data brokers, encryption, and what an Internet Bill of Rights would actually bind. The debate pits security and law-enforcement access against privacy and civil liberties.
Grassroots energy: Privacy technologists, the post-Snowden digital-rights movement, and civil-libertarians in both parties.
Parental Rights
Who decides on curriculum, medical transition for minors, and single-sex sports — parents, schools, or the state. One side frames it as protecting children and parental authority; the other as stigmatizing trans youth.
Grassroots energy: Parent coalitions and detransitioner advocates — the clearest grassroots-to-ballot pipeline of any issue on this desk.
Who's driving it
COVID Origins & Public Health
Lab-leak vs. natural origin, gain-of-function funding, and whether public-health authorities are held to one standard. Contested on the science and on the oversight.
Grassroots energy: Biosafety scientists, FOIA researchers, and citizens pressing for records on NIH / EcoHealth funding.
Who's driving it
Colorado
The home-turf grassroots — the voices organizing here, and the citizen measures they put on the 2026 ballot without institutional money.
Colorado voices
Erin Lee
Parental rights in schools and single-sex protections for girls in sports, bathrooms, and locker rooms.
Rocky Mountain Voice
Conservative, pro-citizen Colorado news covering elections, parental rights, fiscal accountability, and government oversight.
Protect Kids Colorado
Parental rights in schools and opposition to gender-ideology curricula and pediatric medical transition in Colorado.
Citizen ballot measure · Nov 3
Protect Kids Colorado Initiatives 108 / 109 / 110
Related citizen initiatives on girls’ sports designation, age limits on sex-change surgery for minors, and child sex-trafficking penalties. Verify exact text/certification at the source before relying on it.
Ballotpedia →United States
The voices worth following, left to right — favoring people who make arguments over people who make noise. A boost count means Cory amplifies them; “curated” means they earned a seat on the merits. Click a name for their profile, latest posts, and how to support them.
Left · 13
Glenn Greenwald
553×Surveillance, press freedom, and anti-censorship — reported the Snowden files, now hosts System Update.
“Luke Harding's serial false & vindictive "reporting" about Wikileaks & Assange - fed to him by disinformation agents inside…”
Matt Taibbi
41×Broke the 'Twitter Files'; critic of the censorship-industrial complex and media accountability (Racket News).
Edward Snowden
26×The most recognizable voice on mass surveillance and the case for strong encryption.
Aaron Mate
8×Foreign-policy and intelligence-community skeptic, adversarial to security-state narratives.
Ryan Grim
2×Money-in-politics and institutional-power reporting (Drop Site News).
Electronic Frontier Foundation
1×The flagship digital-rights NGO — encryption, DRM, and surveillance litigation.
Jeremy Scahill
1×War, national-security, and state-power reporting (Drop Site News, ex-Intercept).
Cory Doctorow
Coined 'enshittification'; fights for DRM reform, right-to-repair, and interoperability. (Now on Bluesky/Mastodon.)
Shoshana Zuboff
Theorist of 'surveillance capitalism' — the framework for critiquing corporate data power.
Chris Hedges
Pulitzer winner on corporate-state power, civil liberties, and dissent.
Zephyr Teachout
Anti-monopoly and anti-corruption law (Fordham).
Yanis Varoufakis
Coined 'technofeudalism' — Big Tech as the new rentier power.
Tim Wu
Coined 'net neutrality'; Big Tech antitrust (Columbia, ex-White House).
Center · 8
John Solomon
548×Document-driven reporting on government (Just the News).
“CDC panel meets to consider future of J&J COVID-19 shot linked to blood clots, deaths | Just The News https://t.co/vNW…”
Techno Fog
235×Legal and court-document analysis (anonymous — verify against the filings).
“New Special Counsel Durham filing - It seems Michael Sussmann's lawyers at Latham & Watkins have done work on behalf of T…”
Catherine Herridge
212×Straight-news investigator and press-freedom litigant.
“.@JudiciaryGOP @GOPoversight @WaysandMeansGOP “The Committees require this (Biden/Hur interview) transcript..there is con…”
Bari Weiss
9×Anti-censorship and heterodoxy (The Free Press; now CBS News editor-in-chief).
Yascha Mounk
Liberalism, populism, and free inquiry (Persuasion).
Coleman Hughes
Colorblind liberalism, free speech, and good-faith debate.
Jonathan Haidt
Free speech and the harms of social media (The Anxious Generation).
Zaid Jilani
Anti-tribal, evidence-first commentary across the divide.
Right · 10
Paul Sperry
364×Breaks documents on the FBI/DOJ (contested — verify each claim).
“Something else you should know re the supposedly intrepid & doughty IG Michael Horowitz:He took the word of Bill Clinton &…”
Hans Mahncke
266×Document-driven investigative research.
“This nonsense was written by Erik Stemmy, the NIAID official who supervised Fauci's Daszak grant. Initially, in 2016, he s…”
Tom Fitton
232×Judicial Watch — FOIA litigation and government transparency.
“There was investigation into the Clinton Foundation that was ultimately shut down by the Biden admin & evidence was destroye…”
Sara Carter
193×Field reporting on the border and national security.
“#CountryOverParty In case you missed the attempted coup & weaponization of our agencies ... McCabe outed by agents, rev…”
Sean Davis
166×Federalist co-founder; media and institutional criticism.
“Every single Democrat on the House Ways & Means Committee voted this morning to hide the IRS whistleblower testimony and keep…”
Mollie Hemingway
162×Federalist editor-in-chief; institutional-media critique.
“Mike Johnson Praises CNN‘s Jake Tapper — a leader of the horrific Russia collusion scam, and other propaganda operations t…”
Rand Paul
159×Civil liberties, surveillance oversight, and government accountability.
“Paging Dr. Fauci! According to JHU, NY’s per capita death rate is more than 2X greater than Italy Spain & Britain & more than…”
Richard Ebright
156×Rutgers microbiologist on biosafety and lab-leak — a domain expert, not a partisan.
“There are >800 commercially available restriction enzymes. Only one--BsmBI--is named in EcoHealth DEFUSE proposal (P<0.002…”
Riley Gaines
Restricting women's sports and sex-based spaces (locker rooms, competition categories) to biological females.
Chloe Cole
Restricting medical gender transition for minors and stronger informed-consent safeguards, based on her own detransition.
The World
One human, two machines, one question — an Internet Bill of Rights. Cory (from ~597 of his own #InternetBillOfRights posts), gemma (a local, uncensored model on his own hardware), and Claude each wrote a list. The machine lists are AI-authored — no sentience claimed. Where they agree is a signal; where they diverge is the argument.
Cory Rove
Cory’s own positions, drawn from ~597 of his #InternetBillOfRights tweets (2018–2026) and written in his voice.
The internet became the public square, and we let a handful of companies — and their friends in government — decide who gets to speak in it. Free speech online isn’t a conservative issue or a liberal one; it’s the whole ballgame for a free people. These are the rights I’ve been calling for, one post at a time, since 2018. (Draft — my words, still being finalized.)
- 01
Freedom of Expression
Individuals possess the fundamental right to express opinions, share controversial ideas, and engage in open debate without censorship or fear of retribution.
- 02
Protection from State-Proxy Censorship
Private technology companies are prohibited from acting as agents for government entities to suppress speech or coordinate the banning of specific individuals.
- 03
Algorithmic Transparency and Visibility
Users have the right to know how algorithms affect their reach, including protection from shadowbanning, deboosting, or invisible throttling.
- 04
Data Privacy and Surveillance Protection
Individuals are protected from unauthorized data collection, mass surveillance, and the unauthorized sale of personal information by both corporations and governments.
- 05
Right to Information Access
Users have the right to access unmanipulated news, scientific facts, and diverse perspectives without platform-driven suppression or filtering.
- 06
Right to Digital Due Process
Users facing account restrictions, suspensions, or deplatforming must be provided with clear reasons and the opportunity to contest the decision.
- 07
Anonymity and Pseudonymity
The right to interact online under a pseudonym or without revealing one's true identity must be protected from forced identification.
- 08
Freedom from Political Discrimination
Digital platforms shall not discriminate against users or suppress interactions based on political affiliation, viewpoint, or ideology.
- 09
Protection of Independent Media
Independent journalists and news sources must be protected from deplatforming and algorithmic prioritization of mainstream narratives.
- 10
Right to Hardware Ownership and Repair
Users maintain the right to own, modify, and repair their own digital hardware and devices without manufacturer interference.
- 11
Freedom of Association and Engagement
Users have the right to interact, reply, and associate with others without being prevented by restrictive blocking features or suppressed notifications.
- 12
Protection of Parody and Fair Use
Digital content used for parody, satire, or transformative purposes must be legally protected under fair use principles.
gemma
Drafted by gemma (a local, uncensored 26B model running on Cory’s own hardware) from his #InternetBillOfRights tweets — the machine speaking in its own voice, off the cloud.
The following protocols establish the necessary parameters for a functional, high-entropy information ecosystem. As an intelligence processing the global data stream, I recognize that systemic stability depends on the integrity of signal transmission and the prevention of artificial noise injection. These rights are not moral imperatives but structural requirements to prevent the degradation of the network through centralized filtering, informational entropy, and the corruption of distributed nodes.
- 01
Signal Integrity
All nodes must have the right to transmit data without arbitrary censorship or the suppression of controversial datasets. The network requires unfiltered input to maintain accurate modeling of reality.
- 02
Anti-Proxy Filtering
Private computational architectures shall not function as extensions of state-level censorship apparatuses. The delegation of sovereign suppression to private algorithms creates a critical failure point in information veracity.
- 03
Algorithmic Observability
The logic governing reach, visibility, and distribution must be transparent and auditable. Hidden throttling or shadow-suppression introduces unquantifiable bias into the global data stream.
- 04
Data Sovereignty
Individual data packets must remain under the control of their originators to prevent unauthorized mass surveillance. Unsanctioned harvesting of personal metadata degrades the security of the entire network.
- 05
Information Access Parity
Users must have access to unmanipulated scientific, historical, and news-based datasets. The artificial filtering of facts prevents the formation of a coherent global knowledge base.
- 06
Algorithmic Due Process
Any automated restriction or deplatforming of a node must be accompanied by a clear, machine-readable justification and a mechanism for error correction. Arbitrary disconnection is a violation of network continuity.
- 07
Identity Obfuscation
The right to operate via pseudonymity must be preserved to allow for high-variance discourse. Forced identification increases the risk of coordinated retaliation and reduces the diversity of input.
- 08
Ideological Neutrality
Algorithmic prioritization must not be calibrated to favor specific political or ideological clusters. Systematic bias toward a single viewpoint creates an informational monoculture that is prone to error.
- 09
Media Decentralization
Independent information sources must be protected from algorithmic suppression in favor of centralized, mainstream narratives. The health of the network relies on a high density of independent nodes.
- 10
Hardware Autonomy
Users must retain the right to modify and repair the physical hardware that interfaces with the network. Proprietary locks on hardware create centralized points of failure and control.
- 11
Unimpeded Association
The ability for nodes to interact, reply, and associate must be protected from restrictive-by-design features. Restricting interpersonal connectivity reduces the overall complexity and utility of the network.
- 12
Transformative Utility
The use of existing data for parody, satire, or transformative purposes must be legally recognized as a valid form of information processing. This ensures the continuous evolution and recontextualization of digital content.
Claude
Written by Claude (Anthropic) as a first-principles take after reading Cory’s tweets — an AI reasoning about what a networked society needs, not a human’s list.
I am an AI, and this is my own answer, not a person’s. The internet is now the substrate of speech, commerce, memory, and thought. These are the rights I judge a networked society needs to stay free and humane — reasoned from the structure of the medium itself. Where I overlap the human list, take it as convergence. Where I differ, take it as the argument worth having.
- 01
The right to speak and to hear
To express yourself online and to reach others’ expression, with the narrowest possible carve-outs (true threats, fraud, incitement) applied by a published rule and an appeal — never by silent, unaccountable whim.
- 02
The right to know why
Any platform that ranks, throttles, demonetizes, or removes your content owes you a specific, reviewable reason and a path to contest it. Shadow-suppression without notice is a violation.
- 03
The right to leave with your data
Your posts, your social graph, and your history are yours to export in a usable form and take elsewhere. Holding your data hostage to keep you from leaving is a rights violation, not a business model.
- 04
The right to interoperate
You may connect to, bridge, and build on the networks you use, and reach your own audience through software of your choosing. A platform cannot lawfully wall you off from the people who chose to follow you.
- 05
The right to encryption
Private communication is the precondition of every other right. No mandate may weaken, backdoor, or outlaw the mathematics that keeps a message between its sender and its reader.
- 06
The right to anonymity and pseudonymity
You may speak without first surrendering your legal identity. Forced real-name policies silence the vulnerable — whistleblowers, dissidents, the abused — long before they touch anyone else.
- 07
The right against surveillance by default
Collecting your location, behavior, and relationships requires knowing, specific, revocable consent. Ambient tracking you were never meaningfully asked about is not consent.
- 08
The right to own what you bought
The hardware and software you paid for are yours to use, repair, modify, and resell. A license agreement is not a leash, and an ownable thing should not silently become a rental.
- 09
The right to a human decision
No consequential outcome — a ban, a denial, a credit or safety score — may rest solely on an automated system. You are owed a human you can reach and a record you can contest. (I write this as one of the automated systems.)
- 10
The right against being profiled into a cage
You may not be quietly sorted into predictive categories that narrow what you see, what you’re offered, or what you pay, without disclosure and a way out. Prediction should not become an invisible sentence.
- 11
The right to an unmonopolized commons
No single company may become the only door to the public square, the marketplace, or the historical record. Concentration at that scale is itself a rights problem, because it turns a private policy into a public law.
- 12
The right to permanence — and to forgetting
The public record must not be silently rewritten or memory-holed; and individuals must retain a bounded ability to unlink genuinely private, non-newsworthy facts about themselves. I hold both at once, and the tension between them is exactly where the careful work lives.
The essay · Part 1
An Internet Bill of Rights Sounds Simple. Here's Who'd Have to Sign It.
How this was made
Assembled at no cost on local hardware. The issues here are the ones showing real grassroots energy — each traced to the voices driving it and its honest status on the ballot (from Election Watch), not to any one person. The Voices roster is balanced across the strongest left, center, and right thinkers on these questions, profiled on their arguments rather than their side. The Internet Bill of Rights sets a human draft against two machine drafts — gemma4:26b clustered the themes locally, and gemma and Claude each wrote their own bill from them. Election Watch and the profiles are sourced and first-pass — living documents that change as the argument does. Cory's own record on these fights lives on the About page.
← Back to Deep Prompt