Evidence Wiki
COVID Vaccines & Pandemic Response
4 documents, newest first. Tags show what each document establishes on its face versus what it only asserts.
- Jul 18, 2026
Persistence of Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, Spike Protein, and Genomic Dysregulation Over 3.5 Years Post-COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination
other · secondary · McCullough Foundation (USA); Institute of Molecular Diagnostics (INMODIA GmbH, Germany); Municipal Hospital Dresden-Friedrichstadt (Germany); Neo7Bioscience (USA)
This is an abstract/description page hosted on doi.org for a case report describing a 55-year-old male who developed multi-organ dysfunction following three Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses, evaluated through longitudinal molecular, immunologic, and tissue-based analyses over approximately 3.5 years.
- Documented
The document identifies itself as reporting a single case of a 55-year-old male who received three doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine.
“We report a 55-year-old male who received three doses of the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and subsequently developed progressive multi-organ dysfunction”✓ verified verbatim
- Documented
The document lists specific clinical manifestations attributed to post-COVID-19 vaccine syndrome, including pulmonary emboli, myocarditis, neurocognitive impairment, small fiber neuropathy, and other conditions.
“Clinical manifestations included: pulmonary emboli; delayed MRI-confirmed myocarditis; neurocognitive impairment; small fiber neuropathy; autonomic dysfunction; myalgia; chronic pancreatic and gastrointestinal involvement”✓ verified verbatim
- Documented
The authors characterize the long-term bio-distribution and persistence of COVID-19 RNA vaccine components as insufficiently characterized in existing literature.
“The long-term bio-distribution and persistence of components from COVID-19 RNA vaccines remain insufficiently characterized.”✓ verified verbatim
- Documented
The document claims the diagnostic evaluation included more than 40 emergency department visits, more than 200 outpatient specialty encounters, more than 100 non-routine laboratory investigations, and more than 100 imaging/functional studies.
“After >40 emergency department visits and >200 outpatient specialty encounters, the patient underwent >100 non-routine laboratory investigations and >100 imaging/functional studies.”✓ verified verbatim
- Asserted, not shown
The authors claim the extensive evaluation systematically excluded numerous alternative etiologies including infectious, autoimmune, rheumatologic, endocrine, genetic, hematologic, malignant, and other domains.
The underlying test results, data, and methodology used to exclude these alternative etiologies are not included in the provided text; only the assertion of exclusion is present in the abstract.
- Asserted, not shown
The document asserts that residual vaccine RNA, plasmid DNA fragments, and prolonged spike protein expression may contribute to multi-system post-vaccination syndromes.
The abstract states this as background 'emerging evidence' and a study premise but does not present the underlying data or citations within the provided text.
- Asserted, not shown
The title claims persistence of vaccine mRNA, plasmid DNA, spike protein, and genomic dysregulation over 3.5 years, but the full data supporting these specific findings are not present in the provided text.
The title asserts these findings; the provided text is an abstract/description only and does not contain the underlying molecular or genomic data.
- Documented
The diagnostic evaluation was apparently inconclusive across standard testing categories, as the text states testing 'remained largely nondiagnostic.'
“This evaluation systematically excluded underlying etiologic mechanisms across infectious, autoimmune, rheumatologic, endocrine, genetic, hematologic, malignant, toxic/medication-related, cardiovascular/vascular, metabolic, and primary neurologic domains. Testing remained largely nondiagnostic.”✓ verified verbatim
- Documented
The authors considered the possibility that an undocumented asymptomatic COVID-19 infection manifesting as Long COVID may have played a role, particularly in connection with myocarditis diagnosis.
“A possible undocumented/undiagnosed asymptomatic infection manifesting as Long COVID was suspected after myocarditis diag”✓ verified verbatim
- Inferred
The provided text is truncated and the full abstract or full paper content is not included in the document text supplied.
Inference: The Diagnostic Evaluation paragraph ends mid-sentence ('after myocarditis diag'), indicating the document text was cut off before completion, meaning findings beyond this point cannot be assessed from the supplied text.
- Inferred
The document is a repository landing page or metadata record for an article, not the full primary research paper itself.
Inference: The host is identified as doi.org and the content is labeled 'Description / Abstract,' which are typical metadata fields on a repository or preprint landing page rather than the body of a primary research article.
- Inferred
The affiliated institutions span the United States and Germany, suggesting an international collaboration.
Inference: The listed affiliations explicitly name organizations in 'USA' and 'Germany,' from which an international collaboration can be reasonably inferred.
- Jul 18, 2026
We believe in the power of truth.
other · secondary · McCullough Foundation
This is the McCullough Foundation's organizational website homepage, describing its mission, personnel, focus areas, and media appearances in promotional terms.
- Documented
The McCullough Foundation states its mission involves independent investigations, educational content, advocacy, and public health policy shaping.
“The Foundation works to safeguard public health and liberty by performing independent investigations, producing educational content, advocating for justice, and shaping sound public health policies.”✓ verified verbatim
- Documented
Dr. Peter McCullough testified before the U.S. Senate on May 21, 2025.
“On May 21, 2025, he testified before the U.S. Senate about how U.S. government agencies have consistently downplayed this risk, with devastating consequences for thousands of young people.”✓ verified verbatim
- Asserted, not shown
The document claims U.S. government agencies have consistently downplayed the risk of vaccine-induced myocarditis, but provides no evidence or data to support this within the document itself.
The claim is attributed to Dr. McCullough's Senate testimony and 'extensive investigative scholarship,' neither of which is reproduced or linked within this page.
- Documented
The Foundation claims to have published more than 20 scientific studies on COVID-19 vaccine injuries and early treatments.
“Producing rigorous research and publishing peer-reviewed scientific reports, including more than 20 scientific studies on COVID-19 vaccine injuries and early treatments”✓ verified verbatim
- Asserted, not shown
The Foundation claims its published studies are peer-reviewed, but no citations, journal names, or links to the studies are provided in the document.
The document asserts peer-review status but does not reproduce, cite, or link to any of the studies.
- Documented
The document claims autism prevalence rose from approximately 1 in 10,000 children in 1970 to 1 in 31 children in 2025.
“from approximately 1 in 10,000 children in 1970 (derived from early epidemiologic studies) to 1 in 31 children in 2025 (CDC Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring [ADDM] Network)”⚠ not machine-verified
- Documented
The document implies a causal or contributory relationship between routine childhood vaccination and autism spectrum disorder.
“Routine childhood vaccination represents the most extensive and recurrent immune and inflammatory exposure during early neurodevelopment, capable of amplifying underlying susceptibilities.”✓ verified verbatim
- Inferred
The document presents a graph correlating vaccine doses recommended by age two with autism prevalence, implying a meaningful relationship between the two trends.
Inference: The document places vaccine dose counts and autism prevalence on the same chart under the heading 'Autism Prevalence and Vaccine Doses,' which invites the reader to infer a relationship, though no causal analysis or statistical methodology is described on the page.
- Documented
Nicolas Hulscher holds a Master of Public Health in Epidemiology from the University of Michigan School of Public Health, earned in 2024.
“his Master of Public Health in Epidemiology from the University of Michigan School of Public Health in 2024.”✓ verified verbatim
- Documented
Dr. McCullough holds degrees from Baylor University, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, University of Michigan, and Southern Methodist University.
“internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist holding degrees from Baylor University, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, University of Michigan, and Southern Methodist University.”✓ verified verbatim
- Asserted, not shown
Dr. McCullough has more than 1,000 publications and more than 700 citations in the National Library of Medicine, according to the document.
The document states these figures but provides no listing, index, or link to the National Library of Medicine records to substantiate them.
- Asserted, not shown
The document claims the Foundation provided a specific patient ('Brian') with diagnostics and treatment protocols after conventional medicine failed him.
This is a testimonial narrative presented without any clinical records, patient consent documentation, or independent verification.
- Documented
The Foundation describes itself as providing pro bono legal defense and expert witness support to physicians.
“Providing pro bono legal defense and expert witness support to silenced physicians and ethical professionals in landmark medical freedom cases.”✓ verified verbatim
- Inferred
The website is a promotional organizational homepage rather than a primary research document, scientific report, or government record.
Inference: The page structure includes donor appeals, media appearances, team bios, and mission statements characteristic of a nonprofit fundraising/advocacy website, not a primary evidentiary document.
- Jul 17, 2026
What percent of autism cases are attributable to vaccines?
news article · secondary · tobyrogers.substack.com (author: Toby Rogers, referencing Steve Kirsch)
A Substack opinion piece by Toby Rogers explaining the Population Attributable Fraction (PAF) statistical method and applying it to three cited studies to argue that 75.6%–79.6% of autism cases are attributable to vaccines.
- Documented
The author and Steve Kirsch independently arrived at the same PAF estimate for autism cases caused by vaccines.
“Steve Kirsch and I independently arrived at the same estimate for the Population Attributable Fraction (PAF) of autism cases caused by vaccines.”✓ verified verbatim
- Documented
The document defines PAF using the formula PAF = Pe(RR − 1) / [Pe(RR − 1) + 1].
“PAF = Pe(RR − 1) / [Pe(RR − 1) + 1]”✓ verified verbatim
- Documented
The document attributes the intellectual foundation of PAF to Morton Levin in a 1953 paper.
“The intellectual foundation was laid by Morton Levin, an epidemiologist at Roswell Park Memorial Institute in Buffalo, in a 1953 paper in Acta Unio Internationalis Contra Cancrum.”✓ verified verbatim
- Documented
Mawson et al. (2017) reported an odds ratio of 4.2 (CI: 1.2, 14.5) for autism diagnosis in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated homeschool children.
“Mawson et al. (2017) in a study of homeschool children in Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Oregon found that vaccinated children had 4.2 times higher odds of an autism diagnosis compared to unvaccinated children (OR = 4.2; CI: 1.2, 14.5).”✓ verified verbatim
- Documented
Mawson & Jacob (2025) using Florida Medicaid data reported an odds ratio of 4.4 (95% CI: 2.85, 6.84) for autism diagnosis in children with 11 or more vaccination visits vs. those with none.
“Mawson & Jacob (2025) using Florida Medicaid data found that children with 11 or more visits to the doctor that included vaccinations were 4.4 times more likely to have been diagnosed with autism than those with no visit for vaccination (95% CI: 2.85, 6.84).”✓ verified verbatim
- Documented
Hooker & Miller (2021) reported an odds ratio of 5.03 (95% CI: 1.64, 15.5) for autism in vaccinated children across three medical practices.
“Hooker & Miller (2021) in a study of three medical practices in the U.S. found that vaccination increases the odds of developing autism 5.03-fold (95% CI 1.64, 15.5).”✓ verified verbatim
- Documented
The author uses Pe = 0.97 (97% vaccination prevalence) in all three PAF calculations.
“We'll use a Pe of 0.97 to reflect the fact that 97% of children are vaccinated.”⚠ not machine-verified
- Documented
Applying the PAF formula to the three studies yields a range of 75.6% to 79.6%.
“So that gives us our range — 75.6% to 79.6%. What this means is that, if the OR is real and causal, approximately 75.6% to 79.6% of current autism cases would not exist if no children were vaccinated.”✓ verified verbatim
- Documented
The document itself acknowledges that the PAF calculation assumes the OR is causal, not merely associational.
“A key limitation — PAF assumes the OR (or RR) is causal, not merely associational. If the association between vaccination and autism is confounded”✓ verified verbatim
- Asserted, not shown
The three cited studies (Mawson et al. 2017, Mawson & Jacob 2025, Hooker & Miller 2021) establish a causal relationship between vaccines and autism.
The document cites odds ratios from these studies but does not reproduce their methodology, data, or peer-review status; causality is assumed by the author as a premise for the PAF calculation, not demonstrated within this document.
- Asserted, not shown
The claim that 97% of children are vaccinated is taken as given without citation in the document.
The Pe = 0.97 figure is stated as a fact but no source or dataset is cited to support it within this document.
- Inferred
The author treats the odds ratios from these three studies as interchangeable with relative risk for PAF purposes.
Inference: The author acknowledges using OR as an approximation for RR, justified by low autism prevalence; this is an analytical choice that the document describes but the reader must accept or reject independently of what is printed.
- Inferred
The document is an opinion/advocacy piece rather than a peer-reviewed scientific publication.
Inference: It is published on a personal Substack, written in first person, and characterizes its own finding as 'revolutionary' and 'groundbreaking,' indicating editorial rather than peer-reviewed scientific framing.
- Documented
Steve Kirsch previously published work reaching the same PAF estimate, and the author was previously unaware of it.
“I previously missed his groundbreaking work on this topic (see 1, 2, and 3).”✓ verified verbatim
- Apr 29, 2026
A new Majority Staff Interim Report from Sen. Ron Johnson’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations was released today (April 29, 2026), titled Unmasked: How Biden Health Officials Purposely Turned a
news article · secondary · McCullough Foundation (author/publisher via Substack)
A secondary write-up by a McCullough Foundation author summarizing and characterizing the contents of a Majority Staff Interim Report from Sen. Ron Johnson's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations regarding alleged suppression of COVID-19 vaccine safety signals at the FDA.
- Documented
The author states that a Majority Staff Interim Report from Sen. Ron Johnson's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations was released on April 29, 2026, with a specific title.
“A new Majority Staff Interim Report from Sen. Ron Johnson's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations was released today (April 29, 2026), titled Unmasked: How Biden Health Officials Purposely Turned a Blind Eye”⚠ not machine-verified
- Documented
The write-up claims Dr. Ana Szarfman is described as a senior FDA medical officer and key developer of the agency's data mining system.
“FDA senior medical officer Dr. Ana Szarfman (a key developer of the agency's own data mining system) teamed up with Dr. William DuMouchel (the statistician who literally invented FDA's "gold standard" EB data mining algorithm)”⚠ not machine-verified
- Documented
The write-up claims the new method used was called the Regression-Adjusted Gamma Poisson Shrinker (RGPS) and was designed to address a 'masking' flaw.
“Their new method (Regression-Adjusted Gamma Poisson Shrinker — RGPS) fixed a known flaw called "masking" — where signals for one COVID vaccine get drowned out by the sheer volume of reports from the others.”⚠ not machine-verified
- Asserted, not shown
The write-up claims the RGPS analysis identified 49 examples of extreme masking and approximately 25 new statistically significant safety signals missed by FDA's standard method.
These quantitative findings are attributed to the underlying Senate report and/or underlying FDA analyses; no data, tables, or exhibits are reproduced in this write-up to demonstrate them.
- Documented
The write-up claims the safety signals identified included sudden cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary infarction, Bell's palsy, dementia, and 'Death and sudden death' for Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J vaccines.
“Signals included: sudden cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary infarction, Bell's palsy, non-site specific embolism/thrombosis, dementia, and "Death and sudden death" — for Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J shots”⚠ not machine-verified
- Asserted, not shown
The write-up claims Dr. Szarfman shared her findings with CBER officials including Dr. Peter Marks across multiple months in 2021.
The write-up attributes this to internal FDA communications documented in the Senate report; no communications are reproduced here, only the author's characterization.
- Documented
The write-up claims CBER officials told Dr. Szarfman to 'hold off' on creating data mining reports, called her work a 'major distraction,' and eventually issued a 'cease and desist' order.
“Told her to "hold off" on creating and sending any more data mining reports — Called her work a "major distraction" — Worried it would "create erroneous conflicts that feed into anti-vaccination rhetoric" — Eventually ordered her to "cease and desist"”⚠ not machine-verified
- Asserted, not shown
The write-up claims FDA restricted distribution of its weekly data mining reports to CDC around the time FOIA requests and Sen. Johnson's letters arrived.
Attributed to the Senate report; no underlying documentation or timeline is reproduced in this write-up.
- Documented
The write-up claims a CDC official admitted they may have asked FDA to stop sending data mining reports 'because of the FOIAs.'
“One CDC official even admitted they may have asked FDA to stop sending them "because of the FOIAs."”⚠ not machine-verified
- Documented
The write-up claims Dr. Szarfman and Dr. DuMouchel published findings in the journal Drug Safety in 2022 showing masking was eight times more likely with COVID vaccines.
“Dr. Szarfman and DuMouchel published their findings in Drug Safety (2022) showing masking was eight times more likely with COVID vaccines, and Dr. Robert Califf replied "Thanks. These are good,"”⚠ not machine-verified
- Asserted, not shown
The write-up claims no methodological changes were made at FDA after Dr. Califf's acknowledgment of the published findings.
This is a claim about institutional inaction attributed to the Senate report; no evidence of FDA's post-2022 methodology decisions is reproduced here.
- Documented
The author characterizes the described events as a 'deliberate suppression of safety signals' and a 'cover-up,' and calls for accountability.
“This is documented, internal FDA communication showing deliberate suppression of safety signals at the exact moment millions of Americans were being told the shots were "safe and effective." The cover-up continues to unravel. Accountability is urgently warranted.”⚠ not machine-verified
- Documented
The author is affiliated with the McCullough Foundation and is identified as an epidemiologist and foundation administrator.
“Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation”✓ verified verbatim
- Inferred
This write-up represents the author's interpretation and advocacy framing of the Senate report, not a neutral summary.
Inference: The author's institutional affiliation with the McCullough Foundation, combined with explicit normative language ('explosive,' 'cover-up,' 'accountability is urgently warranted'), indicates this is an advocacy-oriented secondary summary rather than a neutral or disinterested account.